Search for: "E Miner"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
Section 44:104(E) now provides that “[t]his section shall apply to mineral leases that are subject to the provisions of the Louisiana Mineral Code. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Over the past twelve months, we have witnessed a rapid evolution in the way that E&P industry participants acquire and own minerals. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
A set of minerals, known as critical minerals, constitute a key part of the supply chains for these important sectors. [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:57 pm
Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC F/K/A Andarko E&P Company, LP, decision of the Texas Supreme Court, which clarified the rights and obligations of owners of the surface property and the mineral interests below, is very important to oil and gas law practitioners in Texas. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:14 am
However, the article reports that there have been "growing complaints... that the Kimberl[e]y Process is failing in its effort, [and, as a result,] additional regulations might lurk in the future [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:11 am
BYD Company, the Chinese battery and car maker that counts Warren E. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:18 pm
We therefore hold that 15 U.S.C. ยง 78m(p)(1)(A)(ii) & (E),... [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:38 am
By Victor E. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:24 am
The natural mineral manganese that is found in nuts and whole food grains could one day be used as an effective E. coli food poisoning treatment. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:31 pm
(e) The owner of the mineral has no obligation to compensate the surface owner for damage to or destruction of the surface caused by removal of the mineral. 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:47 pm
That statute makes it unlawful to "participat[e] in a venture" that engages in forced labor. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:48 pm
EP Energy E&P Co., L.P. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:41 am
E&Y provided a great analysis of the initial wave of filings. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:39 am
Survey Results: Conflict Minerals I have just posted these recent survey results on conflict minerals: 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 11:23 am
On March 3, 2019, the Canadian federal, provincial and territorial governments (other than Ontario and Saskatchewan) collectively unveiled the Canadian Minerals and Metals Plan (the “CMMP”), a forward-looking and generational strategic initiative for the Canadian mining industry intended to “support industry competitiveness, solidify Canada’s position as a global mining leader and to lay the foundation for lasting success at home and abroad. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
But the plaintiffs were objecting to Congress’s purpose, not to the SEC’s process:[W]e find it difficult to see what the Commission could have done better. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:21 am
In the first example below, note that Oracle/Micros has a covenant that the seller has undertaken commercially reasonable efforts to eliminate conflict minerals from its supply chain: - Oracle/Micros (covenant Section 5.23) - Allergan/MAP Pharmaceuticals (see Section 3.29) - Valeant/OBAGI Medical (see Section 4.5) - Met-Pro/CECO Environmental (see Section 4.7(e)) - Citrix Systems/Bytemobile (see Section 2.32) - Salix Pharmaceuticals/Santarus (see Section 5.26) [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:57 am
Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. [read post]
